President Joe Biden has warned of the dangers behind the Russian president. Vladimir Putin’s Nuclear Threats As Moscow continues to face military defeat in Ukraine
“The first time since the Cuban Missile Crisis. We have a direct threat to (its) nuclear weapons if, in fact, things are going the way they are headed,” Biden warned during a speech at a Democracy fundraising event in New York.(Biden offered a warning ‘Armageddon’ Putin’s nuclear threat) which he was introduced by James MurdochThe youngest son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch, according to Poole.
He added: “I don’t think there is anything like the ability to (use) tactical nuclear weapons so easily and not end up with Armageddon.”
It is remarkable for the President to speak openly and incite Armageddon. especially in fundraising events while his aide from the National Security Council So far the State Department and Pentagon have spoken in more measurable terms. say they take the threat seriously But no movement from the Kremlin was seen.
“Am I trying to find Putin’s ramp,” Biden said during the event. “Where did he find a way out? He found himself in a position where he could not only lose face. but also lost significant power in Russia.”
His comments came while the US Considering how to respond to situations that may arise including fears that Russia could use tactical nuclear weaponsAccording to three news sources briefed on the latest intelligence and previously reported.
Officials warned Thursday that the United States has No preparation was detected. For a nuclear attack, however, experts see it as an alternative to the US. must be prepared when the Russian invasion fails. and as Moscow annexed more Ukrainian territories
“The use of this powerful nuclear sword is reckless and irresponsible,” Pentagon spokesman Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder said early Thursday. “As I said earlier, at this stage we don’t have any information. That will require us to change our strategic deterrent stance. And we do not assess whether President Putin has decided to use nuclear weapons at this time.”
After Biden’s words Officials reiterated to Thursday night that they saw no change. to Russia’s nuclear standpoint
A U.S. official said that although Biden warned the world was closest to a nuclear crisis since the 1960s, they have not seen a change in Russia’s nuclear stance as of yet, White House spokesman Karine Jean-Pierre issued a statement. on Tuesday there was no indication of a change in Russia’s stance. So there is no change in the US stance. officials said
senior US government officials expressed surprise at the speech of the President of the United States It said there were no clear signs that Russia was threatening an escalating threat. Biden offered a warning ‘Armageddon’ Putin’s nuclear threat
While there is no question that Russia’s nuclear stance is being taken seriously. But the official said the president’s remarks on tonight’s fundraising had left other officials across the government wary.
“Today, nothing has been found that reflects the upgrade,” the official said. which still defends Biden’s words Because this issue continues to exist. Biden offered a warning ‘Armageddon’ Putin’s nuclear threat
at the fundraising event Biden is speaking clearly about the harassment officers who believe the Russians are posing.
However, US officials has been informed of repeated threats by the President of Russia to use nuclear weapons. In a televised speech late last month Putin said “If the territorial integrity of our country is threatened We will undoubtedly use all means available to protect Russia and our people. This is not bluffing.”
Last Friday, at the ceremony he announced Illegal territorial annexation of four Ukrainian regionsPutin said that Russia would use “Every means available” to protect the area. And added that the United States had “set a precedent” for the nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II.
“We have a guy I know pretty well,” Biden said of Putin on Thursday. “He is not joking when talking about the potential of tactical nuclear weapons. or biological weapons or chemical weapons Because you could say that his army was very inefficient.”
This story has been updated with more information.
